NEWS
FLASH
Last
updated: March 7, 2000
Western
and Mountain District Legislative Lunch
Friday, March 10
Noon, CCI Offices
Bill
Updates:
HB 1283-Wildfire Bill: Passed the
Senate on second reading.
SB 96- Vested Rights: Killed
and P.I.'d in the House State Affairs committee on a 7-6 vote.
HB 1264- Salary
Bill:Passed the Senate State Affairs committee.
HB 1012- Recoup
the Costs of Mailing Motor Vehicle License Plates: Passed out of the
Senate Transportation Committee and is headed to Appropriations.
HB 1101- Speaker
George's Growth Assistance Bill: In House Appropriation Friday morning.
The new State
Revenue Forecast will be made available to the Joint Finance Committee
Thursday morning.
Task
Force Started for Stormwater Regulations
The Colorado Department
of Public Health and Environment held a meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 23 to
discuss Phase II of the regulations for the EPA Stormwater Program. The
Stormwater Program is a national and state regulation that requires certain
categories of dischargers of stormwater to take steps to ensure that the
water is clean. Phase I primarily applies to industries, construction sites,
and large municipalities while Phase II broadens the scope of permit coverage
to include smaller municipalities. A Task Force was formed and is charged
with examining and developing the regulations for Colorado. If your county
would like to be a part of the Task Force or if you need more information,
please contact Kathy Dolan, Colorado Stormwater Program Coordinator, at
303.692.3596.
Nominations
for State Land Board's
Stewardship
Trust
Run
Until April 3, 2000
The second round of the nomination process
allows people to tell the Land Board (SLB) what parcels of state trust
land they feel should be placed in the Stewardship Trust and receive special
stewardship attention. Once nominations close, the SLB will contact the
commissioners in all counties that contain land nominated for the Stewardship
Trust and ask them for comments on the parcels.
Local governments interested in nominating
state trust lands should visit the SLB's website, www.dnr.state.co.us/slb,
for a copy of the nomination form and other information. You can
also contact Stewardship Trust coordinator Kate Jones at kate.jones@state.co.us.
Phone: 303/866-3454x320.
Online
Guide Targets Rural Areas
The National Center for Small Communities
(NCSC) has produced an excellent Internet resource tool for rural communities.
"Getting Online - A Guide to the Internet for Small Town Leaders" provides
a wealth of information on establishing web sites, promoting public access
to the Internet, and attracting high speed telecommunications services
to your community. You may request a copy of this publication by
calling NCSC at 202.624.3550 or e-mailing them at natat@sso.org.
SPRING
BALLOT QUESTIONS
If your district/municipality
is planning to place a question before the voters at this spring's election,
the Division of Local Government (DLG) is ready to assist you with some
important decisions. Last year's Attorney
General's opinion made a new option available to local government in
exempting, or "debrucing," certain revenues. According to that opinion,
local voters can decide to exempt a district/municipality from the "5.5%"
statutory property tax revenue limit (29-1-301, C.R.S.).
Typical "debrucing" language grants authority
to collect, retain and expend funds, dealing with the "fiscal year spending"
limit. If any part of the funds your government intends to retain and expend
are from property taxes, then caution must be taken in wording the ballot
question. You must decide which of the three separate limits on property
taxes you want the ballot to address: TABOR(7)(c) property tax revenue,
the "5.5%" limit, or the TABOR(4)(a) mill limit.
Caution must be taken with the wording
of any referendum, since the final decision of sufficiency will be made
by an appellate court. Considerable financial impact could result if a
ballot question is eventually ruled insufficient.
AGO #99-5 states that ballot language should
be "very clear and unambiguous." A taxpayer should be able to understand
the intent of the questions and its effect. If the mill levy will be affected,
the intended period of time should be clear and direct. If a question is
to authorize excess property tax revenue only, and the mill levy will not
increase or decrease for some period of time, such fact should be stated,
perhaps mentioning the actual tax rate which will be maintained, regardless
of the revenue it produces.
The following is an example of a clear
ballot question intended to exempt property tax revenue from both the TABOR(7)(c)
and the "5.5%" limits:
Shall the mill levy of ______ be maintained
at the 1995 level of 3.992 mills, commencing January 1, 2001 and continuing
thereafter at this constant rate, and shall revenues collected therefrom
be spent without limitation of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution,
and regardless of any revenue limitations in section 29-1-301, C.R.S.,
or any other law?
The staff at the Division of Local
Government is ready to assist you in these complex decisions. If you have
questions concerning ballot or other tax and revenue limit questions, please
call 303.866.2156.
800 Grant Street, Suite 500 Denver, Colorado 80203 303.861.4076
For problems or questions with
this web site please e-mail, webmaster@ccionline.org |